How to use Ross Ohlendorf

Ross Ohlendorf has weapons: a nasty mid-90s sinker and a good slider. Yet he was never considered to be an A-level starting pitching prospect, as his fastball didn’t keep its life over multiple innings and he didn’t have a third pitch. So the Yankees changed him to a middle reliever. He gained life on his fastball and had success.

[How will Ohlendorf be used?]

So now Ohlendorf is with the big club, which considering his talents, is a smart move, as he has the potential to be a top relief pitcher. However, as of right now he is the pseudo-long-man. You’d have to assume this is a product of him being the “low man on the totem pole” and there being no other long reliever. Because, while Ohlendorf did start in the past, they moved him out of that role precisely because he wasn’t effective.

Now take a game like last night: Ohlendorf pitches admirably for his first inning before faltering later. It seems obvious that his future is as a one-inning guy. So why not try him in that role?

With the DL looming for both Brian Bruney and Kyle Farnsworth, there is an opportunity for Ohlendorf to step into one of their roles. The Yankees could then call up Edwar Ramirez to fill the other role and call up Rasner to be the long man. This bullpen configuration, to me, makes more sense.

Regarding Edwar Ramirez, I think it has to be him who is called up. I know that he has been boom or bust when with the Yanks – everywhere from giving up grand slams to striking out the side – but he simply has nothing left to accomplish in the minors. He dominates down there. The Yankees have to just let him pitch for the big league club and take his lumps sometimes if needs be.

Advertisements

2 responses to “How to use Ross Ohlendorf

  1. Absolutely. Ohlendorf can succeed as a one inning man, and might even turn out to be a good closer. Rasner needs to come up for the long reliever spot. I don’t think the Yanks will call up Ramirez anytime soon, but I’d like to see him pitch in the big leagues.

  2. You said Edwar dominates in the minors… maybe dominates isn’t a strong enough word!

    8 G, 9.0 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 1 BB, 13 K

    That is nasty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s